Recently I’ve been involved in some discussions about how teachers might become better users of technology. It began with a post over at Dangerously Irrelevant where Scott McLeod posted
In many industries, knowledge of relevant technologies is a necessary prerequisite for either getting or keeping one’s job. Sometimes the organization provides training; sometimes the employee is expected to get it on her own. Either way, the expectation is that use of the relevant technologies is a core condition of employment.
Why aren’t our school organizations expecting more of their employees? Are we that desperate for workers?
The discussion that follows is worth reading just to see the complexity of the issue. Now, I don’t think that we are desperate for workers or anything like that but it made me wonder why it is that there are many teachers who are not taking advantage of these tools in their teaching.
Now Scott pointed me in the direction of Greg Farr, an administrator in Texas, who has some great posts about technology and its use in the classroom. I suggest that you take a look at what he has to say about technology use in education plus a whole lot of other things.
One of Greg’s posts deals with the use of technology and it being a tool that should be used just like all the other tools a teacher has at their disposal. He describes, very well, the whole idea that teaching is not about the tools but
True teaching and learning MUST allow for subtleties and nuance, for opinions expressed in tone of voice, for emphasis via a small hand gesture, or doubt cast with the slightest raising of an eyebrow.
He goes on to say
I maintain that TO THIS DAY the best way to assess a teachers ability is to take them outside, give them a group of 20 students, no pencils, no paper, no electricity, nothing but a pleasant day and a tree to sit under. And tell them to teach. A true TEACHER would take this opportunity and run with it.
I have to concur 100% with this. Teaching concerns human relationships. It is anchored in assisting students to add to their knowledge, seeking ways to scaffold learning to push them into places where they will need to stretch and question, examine, accept or reject and search for more. It is sometimes uncomfortable and challenging, frustrating and rewarding the whole while being centered around relationships.
A similar thing was happening over at Teaching Generation Z where Graham Wegner’s Parable2.0 provided for a great discussion about how teachers who are wanting to share their passion for the use of web2.0 tools often find it frustrating. The parable looks at how, in their desire to bring other teachers on board, often end up in a frustrating situation. The discussion that followed explored how many teachers identify with the parable and how it unfolded. One such contributor was Clay Burell from Beyond School, his blog looking at teaching, technology and a few other things. Clay’s comment
As a classroom teacher who does drive his own geeky projects, I know how overwhelming it can get – and I have the skills to survive and troubleshoot and tolerate frustrations and “Crosbian Messiness.” To expect others to be able to handle the strain of things too ambitious, or too time-consuming relative to the rest of the teaching load on the teacher’s plate, is dangerous.
is right on the mark. Those of us who are using the tools and doing various projects are able to do so because we have advantages that others don’t. Now, some of these advantages include what Clay points out:
skills to survive and troubleshoot and tolerate frustrations and “Crosbian Messiness.”
However, the one thing that isn’t stated is that many of us have created networks of other users and “techno geeks” with whom we can discuss, question, collaborate and bounce ideas off of. Many of us twitter, pounce, Facebook, Ning, …. sharing our discussions, thoughts and, now that we have developed relationships, parts of our lives. We have adopted the interconnectedness of the networks and built relationships which are now leading to people planning meetings at conferences (like NECC where I WON’T be going!) and personal rendezvous for such things as golf.
Relationships – this is what brings, and binds us, together. Whether it is Sharon Peters looking for feedback on a post, Alec Corous looking for assistance with web conferencing, Vickie Davis and Julie Lindsay discussing their Horizon Project, Will Richardson and his discussions of learning or Dan Meyers, who questions and challenges, helping to stretch the discussion, helping us to reflect on our ideas and thoughts while providing some great tools and insights into using web2.0 tools in teaching, these relationships help us connect and develop, grow and learn, keep our perspective and motivate us These relationships have become a large part of how we are growing and developing our teaching and understanding. These are the relationships that those teachers not engaged DO NOT have.
Showing other teachers all the tools isn’t what is needed. Helping them develop relationships and make connections is. We can show and demonstrate, rave and mandate; it will not bring others to question, grow and adopt. We have many examples of educators who are beginning to delve into using these tools. Overwhelming them with the possibilities just pushes them away. Helping them to build their own networks, seeking out teachers who, like themselves, are testing the water and encouraging them to continue in their own lifelong learning will empower them to develop even more. Not all of them will see the benefits of all the tools they encounter but the relationships they develop during this process will go further, I believe, to bringing about powerful change than any tech person can hope to do by themselves. Maybe that’s the lesson we need to take with us as we continue to approach those around us, showing them the power of our networks and the learning that these networks encourage. As was posted tonight on twitter
kolson29 finished watching really bad movie, off to bed. Twitterverse very different from even a week ago…….more “conversations”, less telling.
Let’s invite others to start their own conversations, starting where they are and moving forward instead of where we want them to be.


8 responses so far ↓
[...] Read the rest of this great post here [...]
[...] Read the rest of this great post here [...]
Well, that’s amazing! I find this post on twitter, click on it, and I find myself twitter-quoted!!! Whoa, pretty crazy. I was on my way to write a post about twitter and got distracted by yours. For your readers, check out my struggle with this topic at http://googtweetblog.edublogs.org – “Learning to Share – Part 1″ and Learning to Share – Part 2″. I’m going to be writing my post this a.m. on much the same topic as your post, but from a slightly different perspective. Off to work on it now!
“… why it is that there are many teachers who are not taking advantage of these tools in their teaching…”
The problem is teachers cannot use the technologies to teach before they’ve learned how to use the technologies to learn. You *can* teach Shakespeare without being able to read, but you’re at the mercy of outsiders to tell you what the play’s about before you can pass it on and your interpretations are limited by what you’re told — rightly or wrongly.
That’s what’s going on in technology and education. A few people have studied the work, are enthusiastic about the canon, and are working hard to spread the word. Unfortunately, before others can really use the richness of the connected lifestyle, they need to adopt some of the practices of that lifestyle to support their own learning.
A teacher who wants to use blogs in the classroom should expect to blog for a year to find out what it’s about before subjecting students to a requirement to “write at least 500 words about xyz each week and leave a comment on at least four classmates’ postings.”
An instructor that wants to use Ning as an extended classroom should spend time in a Ning as a participant to learn the dynamic of the space as a social environment. Failure to do so turns Ning into a Geocities website and loses the value of being there in the first place.
Authors are encouraged to write what they know. Teachers can only teach the way they know how to learn. If they are not using the technology to learn, then they are at a severe disadvantage when it comes time to use it to teach. Those who pick a technology and take the time to use it, can usually find a way to adopt, adapt, or abandon it, before moving on.
As you point out, “[t]eaching concerns human relationships.” Technology allowing us to connect to other humans takes some degree of mastery and the willingness to invest time and effort to acquire it. It’s not overwhelmingly huge, but it does require a certain level of “bunny-slope bravery.”
“Bunny-slope bravery” is that level of risk taking required for the novice skier who’s standing at the top of the bunny-slope for the first time, and looking down, to actually plant poles and push off. Looking down, that’s one scary hill! Those who overcome the fear and get to the bottom, look back and think, “What was I afraid of?”
Having only used twitter seriously in the last week or so, I agree with the social networking comments. Two people on twitter took time and great care to introduce me to some twitter friends whom I could follow and whom they knew would follow me and allow valuable interaction. Otherwise I was following some, unable to interact, unable to learn much and about to nearly give up.
RE: what Nate wrote….
Yeah. What he said.
(I’ve learned when it’s best to just shut up and nod my head in agreement with those who say it better, and both you and Nate did so with this post.)
Nate, I like your analogy of the bunny hill. It does capture the essence of what we are discussing. What one usually finds at the top of a bunny hill is an instructor who is there to help those starting in order to make that first experience successful so that the person keeps at it. We have some teachers standing at the top who need that assistance. We also have many more whom are looking at trying skiing but are afraid of hurting themselves, satisfied with the sports they are playing, convinced it’s only for younger people or afraid that they won’t be able to control the skies. To get them to that bunny hill, we need to introduce them to others who, like them, were not interested in trying so that they can share stories and answer questions.
murcha – exactly. Even I, who have been using the tool for some time, am not always able to leverage it as I’d like at times because of “life”. But, I’m finding it easier to get back into the conversations – kind of like seeing people you haven’t for some time. The conversation just happens.
Perhaps the teachers who are not jumping on-board are not aware is available to them? I think the biggest problem is that perhaps there are too many possibilities for “jumping in”. This actually makes it scarier then it really is.
I like the idea of “Change One Thing”, and relate it to technology. Make one technological change, whether its a Google Reader account or a Wiki, the important thing is to change something.
Leave a Comment